
\begin{table}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{3.5} D{.}{.}{3.5} D{.}{.}{3.5} D{.}{.}{3.5}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{External Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Satisfaction with Democracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Internal Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Political Interest} \\
\midrule
Group 2                 & 0.13       & -0.11      & 0.33^{*}   & 0.24^{*}   \\
                        & (0.15)     & (0.13)     & (0.18)     & (0.14)     \\
Wave 2                  & 0.00       & -0.00      & 0.19       & 0.16       \\
                        & (0.14)     & (0.13)     & (0.17)     & (0.14)     \\
Group 2 $\times$ Wave 2 & -0.16      & -0.12      & 0.02       & -0.09      \\
                        & (0.21)     & (0.19)     & (0.26)     & (0.20)     \\
(Intercept)             & 2.91^{***} & 3.77^{***} & 2.93^{***} & 3.18^{***} \\
                        & (0.10)     & (0.09)     & (0.12)     & (0.09)     \\
\midrule
R$^2$                   & 0.00       & 0.01       & 0.03       & 0.02       \\
N                       & 343        & 346        & 343        & 348        \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{l}{\tiny{\footnotesize $^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\end{small}
\caption{The effect of losing eligibility. Presented estimates capture the results from DiD-specifications comparing groups 1 and 2 across waves1 and 2. Based on a birthdates sample with bandwidth 50.}
\label{table:coefficients}
\end{center}
\end{table}
